India and the 2nd Amendment of US constitution

I watched two Tamil movies recently and was surprised to see a new trend. In old time movies, there will be a clear cut villain and an all powerful hero who overcomes evil and either changes the villain to be a good guy or hands him over to police. Then they portrayed heinous criminals as villains and they got killed by the heroes. We saw portrayal of bad guys as kings, jamindars, politicians, police, dadas etc. That changed overtime and we started seeing stories of gangsters and paid killers fighting with each other. The level of violence on screen meanwhile went through the roof.

Now we have a new trend. Innocent victims revolting in novel ways to kill the bad guys! "Yutham Sei" and "Easen" portray smart little guys, who mind their own business in general, get victimized by criminals and they scheme and succeed in killing the evil doers! Of course, this trend culminates from a total lack of faith in the institutions in India. The state of affairs signifies that common man has entirely lost confidence in the police, justice system and the social security. Everyone is on their own. Jungle law, the survival of the fittest prevails! A total systemic meltdown in other words. Unfortunately it is not far from reality in places like Madurai (sic).

For a long time I have noticed in Indian society that for the sake of security and protection, people with means need to ally themselves and play subservient to those with muscle and political power. If you are a salaried individual you probably don't come face to face with this power dynamics of the landlords, businessmen and agriculturists. In an increasingly urbanized society that sort of clan-ship is lost. That gives bad apples more opportunity to go after innocent unprotected common folks, especially in urban settings. When the bad guys go unpunished and those who are supposed to protect the innocent play cahoots with the bad guys or stay ineffective with ludicrous case backlogs that takes years to bring someone to justice, more number of people act bad and more innocent people will have to take charge on their own. Thus a vicious cycle is set in motion.

In this context, I see the 2nd amendment of US constitution as a mechanism to increase protection of innocent people. For a long time, I didn't understand the meaning of this bill of right.
"well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
The fundamental belief here is that because a nation need to keep an army, individuals have a right to keep weapons to protect themselves!


If you think of this in the mindset of a bad guy, before he dares to commit an evil act against innocent people, if he knows that he may get hurt, do you think he will hesitate a little? Won't there be increased courtesy in dealing with all people? If a stranger walks in to a home and the home owner shoots him down, it is identified as an act of self defense and the home owner is protected by law. House break-ins are the lowest in US! Police treat everyone with respect. You cannot abuse a decent, educated and honest man or women if there is a possibility that they could be armed. It may sound strange. But increasing licensed arms to rightful people who are responsible citizens of the society will reduce crime. After all that was proven by the former commissioner of police Mr. KPS Gill in Punjab in the 80s to defeat the Khalistan movement. He armed and trained the villagers to protect themselves from dacoits and fight against terrorists. Isn't it every individual's right to defend themselves and their loved ones from mindless thugs who run around with swords and terrorize innocent people?


Our college Professor Sri Krishna used to say, "A man with integrity and not intelligence is not bad. A man with intelligence, but not integrity is dangerous" One way to disarm the people without integrity is to arm the people with integrity. Of course there will be a period of lull when the crime may seem to increase when the bad guys learn the effectiveness of the new reality. But I am sure more bad guys will be affected than good ones and the society will benefit by far.


Having said that, a very strict policy should be administered to license the arms to the right kind of people. I am mindful of the literacy levels and maturity of minds of the majority in India. Perhaps a psychological profiling is necessary. A training program and evaluation on ethics and values should be mandatory. If we can conduct professional colleges exams, train reservations, civil services, passport issuance etc in a corruption free manner, this should also be doable.


What do you think...?

Life's a mystery...

Kittu Mama - an innocent spirit from our family, unlocked and liberated from his physically and mentally challenged self this week. Call it a gene mutation, Down's syndrome, a genetic defect or by any other name, he was a helpless creation that toiled in life for nearly over 50 years. Nature's experiments are beyond comprehension to us, the mere mortals.Somehow the 23 pair of chromosomes didn't sit well for him and no force on earth could change that.

My memories of him go way back to when I was a child visiting my sister's house. Only a few memories of him stuck with me. He had six fingers in his hands and lived almost in hiding most of his life in a dark corner of the house. Those days they were growing couple of cows at home. He was good with cows! Somehow it felt like he could speak with them and they spoke back to him. He had no conception of value for money. Anything you give becomes meaningful only after he exchanged it for coconut pieces and snack dal (pori-kadalai) from the corner shop. Be it 25 paise or 10 rupees. Didn't matter. Days, months and years passed and he grew older physically, yet his vision dimmed. His mind and senses were left behind.

The question that persists in me is "Why?" We humans are forever limited in our understanding of the purpose of life and have to rely on our imagination to answer that question. I understand Karma is one possible explanation, if you believe in rebirth and the continuity of soul outside of bodily existence. I don't know. May be it is true, may be not. The question shall remain unanswered and forever a mystery.

Evolution chooses subjects at random to experiment. Some decisions in the ancestry might have increased the probability of those experiments in the family. Many lives are bound by the consequences of such decisions and the nature's experiments that followed. Today, we remain as helpless witness to more than one spirit that didn't flourish, incapable to lead a productive life and thus wither way in the end. Literacy that teaches to avoid marriage between kins, medical tests during conception, general awareness of health would have all helped. But hindsight is 20/20. Call it fate or destiny. What happened, did happen for unknown reasons.  To mourn the passed and witness the living forever unknowingly enslaved in life as dependents of others is today's reality.

May the spirit of Kittu mama be free at last. Some religions belief that earthly life is misery and after life is bliss. Wish it is true for his sake. Rest in peace or pass through another body, let him flourish next time around.

Interests and Values

It is often quoted that "Nations don't have permanent friends or enemies, only interests". We saw an example of that in the past weeks. Egypt's Hosni Mubarak was an ally of United States for a long time and helped maintain peace in the middle east by focusing Egyptians away from Palestine and Israel. But when Egyptians rose to demand freedom and democracy, US supported the people's struggle much to the dismay of Mubarak and other similar rulers in the adjacent countries who are allies of US.

Often times a nation finds itself having interests and thus dependency on other nations whose values don't match up with it. U.K and U.S. sided with Soviet Union, a dictatorship under Stalin to defeat the common enemy Germany in the second world war. U.S values are democratic. Unalienable rights of individuals and freedom, protection of life and liberty, and equal opportunity for the pursuit of happiness are the cornerstones of US belief system. Yet, we live in a world where much of those values are only dreams to citizens of many nations. Is it possible for a nation to isolate itself and/or work with only countries that share its values?

For a long time, almost the entire 19th century, US lived in isolation that ended after the attack on the Pearl Harbor during second world war. Technology innovations followed, and the globalization of the world became inevitable. Needs are every where. Nations that produce or can produce valuable goods surplus to their needs, should be able to trade and share the goods with where ever the needs are present. Resources should similarly be traded and used to build goods that benefit everyone. And there starts the dilemma!

Middle East has oil, a precious natural resource that is needed to run today's world be it US, Europe or the emerging economies. Whereas values of the nations that host the oil resource are far from democratic. What do you do? When your core values and your national interests conflict, does a nation isolate itself and not serve the national interest?! Consciously with the awareness to benefit the citizens of one nation, the fate of the citizens of other nation are seen as a jurisdiction of the rulers of the other nation. You protect and serve your national interest, I will take care of mine, went the logic. Much like how families work at a smaller level. But from time to time when heinous crimes, abuse or genocide is witnessed, nations of the world cannot standby and leave that as a domestic issue. UN was established for the very purpose to protect the citizens of the world from their governments and facilitate the world forum to intervene as necessary. It is a different story that UN stood watching over what happened in Rwanda, Darfur and Srilanka in the recent history. But I digress.

Coming back to the topic of interests and values, the recent events in Egypt show that the technology is enabling people of the world understand and demand their rights from their rulers and governments. To what extend will it be successful and how quickly across different nations is yet to be seen.

After pressure from the King(s) of the Middle Eastern countries and also to protect its national interest, US has softened its tone now with a statement that "US will help maintain stability in the region". That is, it will not express its enthusiastic support to the people of Bahrain, Libya, Algiers, etc wherein there is copy-cat gatherings and protests following successful toppling of Mubarak in Egypt. Of course, US will issue strong statements to condemn any violence against innocent people and ask the rulers to exercise restrain. National interests once again triumphs over the core values!

This is much in line with how the choice was handled historically in America. Some of the founding fathers of US, including Jefferson and Washington, while they wrote in their Declaration of Independence that "all men are created equal", were slave owners! It took a civil war in Lincoln presidency to abolish slavery. It took another century until Martin Luther King Jr came around to abolish segregation.It is neither easy nor fast to change the hearts and minds of people.

Hopefully in future, the choice between values and interests will vanish and a nation need not have to choose one over the other. Freedom and justice to all citizens of the world, free and fair elections in all countries, trade partnership among nations for the mutual benefit of the citizens of both nations rather than just the rulers of one nation, may sound like an idealistic state of the world. But one that is not impossible; most likely probable in this century.

Welcome Watson!

This is one very smart computer! If knowledge is power, the human race is about to lose it to this machine!

Ambition and paths of glory...

Recently I read these powerful lines from the poem "Elegy written in a country church-yard" by Thomas Gray (1716-1771)

Let not Ambition mock their useful toil,
Their homely joys, and destiny obscure;
Nor Grandeur hear with a disdainful smile
The short and simple annals of the Poor.

The boast of heraldry, the pomp of power,
And all that beauty, all that wealth e'er gave,
Awaits alike th' inevitable hour:-
The paths of glory lead but to the grave.


Apparently Thomas Alva Edison liked to recite these lines to his close associates! A man who was an ardent inventor and profoundly changed the life of entire humanity with his inventions was mindful of his gifts in life and was humble enough to walk by these lines.